A single winter dawn each year, the sun shoots a copper beam straight down Avenida 18 de Julio and seems to rest on the Obelisco that celebrates Uruguay’s 1830 Constitution. Did nineteenth-century surveyors plan this celestial salute, or is it a lucky quirk of topography? Field notebooks, ridge-line maps, and some step-by-step probability suggest the truth balances on a knife-edge.
A Dawn Discovery That Went Viral
Just after 7:30 A.M. on Constitution Day 2023, architect and hobby astronomer Gustavo Degeronimi found himself straddling the yellow median near Plaza del Entrevero. He had opened a sun-tracking app the night before to plan a construction shadow study and noticed something odd: the sunrise for July 18 would appear at an azimuth—think of it as the compass direction of the rising sun—of almost exactly 64 degrees. He also knew, from years of biking the city, that the long spine of Avenida 18 de Julio points about the same way.
Curiosity won. He slipped out before first light, phone camera ready. As the sun’s upper rim cleared Montevideo’s eastern rooftops, a liquid band of gold rippled down the asphalt canyon, touching every maintenance hole cover and bus-stop shelter. For a brief, breathtaking moment, the disk seemed to rest like a crown on the forty-meter Obelisco to the 1830 Constitution. Early commuters turned to silhouettes against the flare; street cleaners stared, brooms mid-air.
Degeronimi posted a twenty-second clip with the caption “Nuestro Manhattanhenge patria .” The video exploded. By noon, astrophysicist Gonzalo Tancredi had confirmed the geometry: sunrise azimuth on July 18 is 64 degrees, give or take a fraction; the avenue’s surveyed bearing matches within the width of a thumbnail held at arm’s length.
When Constitution Day rolled around in 2024, more than a hundred early risers gathered for the show the city now calls “18 en 18.” A trumpet played the national anthem; the hashtag #SolConstituyente filled social feeds with blazing street shots. But the viral fame raised an irresistible question: Did Uruguay’s nineteenth-century planners choose the avenue’s direction to honor the constitution-day sunrise, or are modern citizens projecting romance onto a happy accident?
To test intent, historians dialed the calendar back to 1829. Montevideo’s Spanish walls had just been razed, and the fledgling government wanted boulevards as bold as its republican ambitions. Interim governor José Rondeau tasked Sergeant-Major José María Reyes—soldier, cartographer, part-time astronomer—with staking out a “grand street thirty varas wide” to run from the port uphill toward the interior.
Reyes walked the crest of the Cuchilla Grande ridge. The high ground offered drainage, defensive sight-lines, and spared labor-hungry earthworks. In a faded notebook housed at the Naval Museum, he jotted a key line: “rumbo NE 45° magnético.” In today’s true-north terms, that’s roughly 64 degrees—exactly the modern bearing.
By 1836, the artist-engineer Juan Manuel Besnes Irigoyen had etched the route onto copper plates, locking the boulevard’s direction in print. The name “Avenida 18 de Julio” came a decade later, when city councillors decided to brand the street with the date Uruguay’s first constitution was sworn. The granite Obelisco was followed in 1938.
Crucially, no surviving city minutes mention sunrise alignments. They talk about drainage, parade routes, and creating “an expedient military road.” Yet hints of astronomical awareness linger: Reyes compiled star charts for artillery and kept tables of magnetic declination. Tancredi, the astrophysicist, argues that an error under one degree is “hard to hit by accident when your ridge allows several plausible angles.”
Skeptical historians push back: the ridge itself forces surveyors into a narrow band of east-west headings. At the city’s latitude—34.9° south—any broad east-west street will align with the rising sun on two specific days a year; you could attach a patriotic name afterward. Whose logic carries more weight?
Wikimedia Commons
Playing the Odds: Luck or Design—Explained the Plain-English Way
To make sense of competing stories, think of the puzzle as two possibilities:
- Coincidence. Reyes aimed the avenue mainly for practical reasons. The fact that July 18’s sunrise lines up is a fluke.
- Design. Reyes—or later officials—chose the avenue’s bearing so the Constitution Day sunrise would hit the street dead center.
Here’s how to weigh them step by step without advanced math:
1. How perfect is the match?
The sun’s face in the sky is about half a degree wide. Viewers say the scene looks spectacular if the center of the sun is no more than one degree off the center of the street. On July 18, the difference is less than 0.3°—well within the “wow zone.”
2. What counts as “close enough”?
Near the Southern Hemisphere’s winter, the rising sun shifts about one-third of a degree each day. So if the sun has to be within one degree to look perfect, the alignment feels dramatic for roughly two days before and two days after the exact date, four good mornings total.
3. How often would any given holiday land in that four-day window by luck?
Four “good” days out of 365 means a little over a 1 percent chance (4 divided by 365).
4. How many holidays were on the nineteenth-century calendar?
Historians list about ten significant civic dates in early Uruguay: Independence Day, Flag Day, Army Day, and so on. The chance that at least one of those ten falls in the four-day window rises to about 10 percent.
5. What about the direction of the street itself?
Not every road could point east-west. Colonial expansions usually ran many streets north-south and fewer east-west. Suppose one in four possible bearings ran roughly east-west. That multiplies the coincidence chance from 10 percent to around 40 percent. In other words, pure luck could plausibly explain the alignment four times out of ten.
6. So, where does that leave us?
If an engineer in the 1820s truly wanted a sunrise trick, he had the tools—sun tables were printed in every navigation manual. But the surviving paperwork stays silent, and the terrain itself nudged him toward that general direction anyway. When you blend those facts, the odds settle near fifty-fifty: half a coin toss’s chance Reyes planned a solar salute, half a chance the sky happens to cooperate.
That razor-thin balance is why Montevideo’s dawn puzzle keeps historians and astronomers politely sparring over espresso.
Why the Alignment Matters—Whether Planned or a Cosmic Fluke
Intent may remain elusive, but meaning has snowballed. Civic ritual loves coincidence: New Yorkers pack sidewalks for “Manhattanhenge,” although no grid designer aimed for sunset selfies. Montevideo’s link is tighter—avenue name, national holiday, and sunburst line up so perfectly it feels scripted by fate.
Teachers already use the dawn as a living blackboard—geometry of sun angles, physics of light scattering, and a dash of constitutional history. Cafés near Plaza Cagancha now open at six for pre-sunrise medialunas. The tourism board is toying with dawn photo contests.
Research soldiers on. Tancredi is mapping nineteenth-century magnetic declination to see whether Reyes’ compass naturally pointed to 64° that July. Archivists scour Besnes Irigoyen’s notebooks for phrases like “alineada al sol patrio.” Degeronimi, whose tweet lit the fuse, is lining up volunteers for a 2026 shadow-tracking project—citizen science wrapped in civic pride.
Stand on the boulevard next to Constitution Day and you’ll feel why the question keeps biting. Winter mist clings to the asphalt. The eastern horizon reddens. Suddenly, the sun explodes between facades, the Obelisco glows like a torch, and for sixty heartbeats, Montevideo feels pivoted on a celestial hinge. Maybe Reyes grinned knowingly in 1829; perhaps he never noticed. The light reaches us either way, a reminder that cities are palimpsests where drainage ditches, military roads, patriot dreams, and orbital mechanics coexist.
Chance or design? The dawn doesn’t say. It just delivers its golden arrow right on schedule—an annual invitation to look east, squint into the flare, and celebrate both the marvel of statistics and the possibility of human genius.
Also Read: Chile’s Communists Unlikely to Evolve Before Voters Turn Conservative
Credits: Field footage by Gustavo Degeronimi (2023), geometric confirmation by astrophysicist Gonzalo Tancredi, archival bearings from José María Reyes’ 1829 notebook (Naval Museum, Montevideo), historical mapping by Juan Manuel Besnes Irigoyen (1836), contemporary classroom and tourism initiatives reported by Montevideo’s Municipal Culture Department.