A new U.S. travel advisory brands cartel violence in Mexico as “terrorism,” jolting the tourism industry, stoking political tension, and unsettling the millions who travel—or live—south of the border. Behind the bold language lies a map colored in contradiction.
The “T” Word Shifts the Narrative
For the first time, the U.S. State Department has linked terrorism to Mexico in its national travel advisory, invoking a term that immediately elevates urgency—and confusion. Though the country remains at Level 2 overall (“exercise increased caution”), the new alert warns of “terrorist violence, including attacks and related activities” in the same breath as familiar threats like homicide, kidnapping, and carjacking.
The map that results is a patchwork of red, orange, and yellow. Six states—Colima, Guerrero, Michoacán, Sinaloa, Tamaulipas, and Zacatecas—are marked Level 4: “Do Not Travel.” Another eight, including Jalisco, Baja California, and Sonora, are flagged at Level 3: “Reconsider Travel.” Only Campeche and Yucatán remain green at Level 1.
The coloring has a real-world impact. Tour operators, business travelers, and Mexican-American families planning summer returns all take cues from the chart; however nuanced the fine print may be, even for seasoned travelers who know the difference between a rural highway in Zacatecas and a beach resort in Nayarit, the word “terrorism” sticks. It turns ordinary concerns—about road safety, for example—into questions about state control.
For the million Americans living in Mexico and the tens of millions who visit each year, the latest language marks a rhetorical escalation. Whether it reflects an actual change on the ground or a political shift in Washington is part of the fallout.
Behind the Label, a Geopolitical Dance
The timing of the advisory isn’t lost on anyone watching the U.S.-Mexico relationship. Former President Donald Trump has spent months demanding that the Pentagon treat Latin American cartels as terrorist groups, even suggesting military action inside Mexico’s borders. His campaign rhetoric has seeped into policy talk, and this new phrasing—subtle or not—reads like an echo.
Meanwhile, Mexico has stepped up its gestures of cooperation. Two mass extraditions this year saw 29 suspects flown north in February, and another 26 this week. Some were low-profile; others weren’t. The U.S. Department of Justice confirmed that Rafael Caro Quintero, accused in the 1985 torture and killing of DEA agent Kiki Camarena, was part of the first batch.
Mexico has its conditions—most notably, no extraditions where the death penalty is in play—but it’s clear that coordination is ongoing. A broader binational security agreement is nearing the finish line, even as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum draws a firm line: collaboration, yes; boots on the ground, no.
Sheinbaum has also tried to reframe the terrorism label as legal semantics, arguing that no new threat has emerged. “Mexico is still the top U.S. tourist destination,” she told reporters. And the data backs her up. From beach resorts to food festivals, Mexico remains a magnet. But every shift in language has consequences.
Arrests, Spikes, and the Reality of Retaliation
Mexico’s crime wave didn’t begin last week. Its arc stretches back nearly two decades, since the government first militarized its fight against organized crime. Still, President Sheinbaum has pointed to signs of progress: in her first 11 months in office, daily homicides dropped by more than 25%, from nearly 87 per day to just under 65—the lowest since 2015.
Security forces have seized over 3.5 million fentanyl pills in the last year, and 29,000 people have been arrested, including high-level cartel figures. Omar García Harfuch, the federal security chief, credits targeted investigations and stronger intelligence.
But victories come with backlash. Nowhere is that clearer than in Sinaloa, where the August 2024 arrest of Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada set off a wave of bloodshed. In the first six months of this year, the state logged 883 homicides—quadruple last year’s tally for the same stretch. Over 1,500 disappearances have been reported, many tied to criminal reprisals or infighting.
Zambada’s case is especially tangled. He was arrested at an airfield near El Paso, Texas, and claims he was kidnapped by Ovidio Guzmán, son of “El Chapo,” and handed to U.S. authorities. If true, it speaks to the layers of betrayal and shifting alliances that haunt Mexico’s cartel landscape. It also explains why progress can feel like whiplash: bold arrests followed by retaliatory chaos.
These contradictions—the difference between a falling national average and a state-level surge—help explain why a color-coded map can feel wildly disconnected from the lived experience of locals and tourists alike.
EFE@Juan Manuel Blanco
Tourism Reframes Itself in Real Time
So how does a country keep drawing visitors when its map turns orange and red? By changing the pitch. Mexican tourism authorities have shifted focus from sun and sand to food, music, and cultural heritage. Their gamble is that people will come for more than beaches—and that these deeper stories will outlast sensational headlines.
Officials don’t deny the risks. They argue for context. Millions move through airports and highways safely each week. Most violence, they say, happens far from the routes travelers take. Even in “Do Not Travel” zones, pockets of tourism continue uninterrupted.
The government now promotes tourism as a bridge to stability, and travelers—especially returning diaspora—are responding. Experienced visitors understand the nuance: that Level 4 doesn’t mean war zone, that Level 2 doesn’t mean worry-free. They book through vetted platforms. They avoid rural highways at night. They follow local guidance. In many cases, they continue to visit without incident.
But the stakes are high. A chilling advisory can ripple into airline bookings, business conferences, and even student exchanges. The “terrorism” label may play politically in Washington, but in Mexico, it’s a branding crisis waiting to happen. Sheinbaum’s government is betting that message discipline and sustained cooperation can keep the worst fears at bay.
Also Read: Colombia’s Indigenous Guard Risks Everything to Bring Recruited Children Home
Whether that gamble holds depends not only on maps and military options—but on what travelers see, hear, and decide for themselves. In a country defined by both beauty and complexity, navigating the space between risk and reward has always been part of the trip.